![]() ![]() Now i think that the B757 and B767 where the first widebody mid and long range twin engine aircraft introduced on the market.ītw: I was training with the original Boeing CBT (programm was released in the early / mid 90`s for flight crew training) as a training for the 767 Flight Deck Systems and my impression is, that the FMC and other Systems: Autoflight etc. #Captain sim boeing 767 300 fsx download seriesrange of 11.306 km) the airlines could now fly to destinations where which they only could reach with costly wide bodies like the L1011, the DC-10 or the 747-200/300.Īs it is sad in the book ""Crowood Aviation Series - Boeing 757 767" the A300 has a higher passenger capacity but the 767 (with its later version 300ER, has light higher range + it the boeing Marketing presented it to the customers as the more "modern" airliner, with newest flightdeck with CRT`s and avionics systems). September 1982 where both ahead of its time, and with the range of the B767-300ER ( with the max. All in all the 757 /767 Series by Introduction in service in 8. I read the book: "Crowood Aviation Series - Boeing 757 767", first of all the 767 was the first twin engine plane which get ETOPS rating for intercontinental routes in comparison to the L1011 and DC10 it has (now only 2 engines and again reduces the maintenance cost) + at its introduction, has the lowest flight cost and fuel burn (100 km / per Pax), and it has the most modern the flight deck, modern FMC, avionics, failure analysis by EICAS and failure report management to the maintenance crew made this plane very reliable, still the 767-300ER`s good fuel consumption is quite as good as the fuel consumption of the A321 ACF / NEO. ![]() I'm looking forward to seeing the next release when it comes - if it ever does come. The 767 is still my favourite Captain Sim modern airliner. + i use the frame rate friendy scenery from another company for ex.Īll in all i have a very good frame rate at mid alt, and low alt at the airpots, i got no crashes with FSX.Īt the Moment im goint to use during my flights an extra laptop for JeppView for Windows, in order to quick overview the applicable approach charts and general flightpath / flightplan overview on an extra Monitor. I got an i with 3,5 GhZ and 16 GB DDR-RAM, i also have a modern GPU the saphire Radeon Nitro RX 470 with 8 GB GDDR5). But all in all the Captain Sim 767 offers many systems and parallel to that a very good frame rate (at the moment i fly the FSX at mid to high settings with Captain Sim 767, at very good frame rates! My only point for critics is that the EICAS has only some few pages, for ex. add waypoints, fuel caclulation) the MCP panel works also very well, Autopilot, etc. me personally i dont like the Airbus Series: A320, A330 (not in the real aviation neither in the flight simulator)Ĭaptain Sim 767 for FSX offers a very good FMC, which i can programm during flight (for ex. EDDF-LEPA, EDDF-EDDH, or EGLL to EDDF i also have flown a lot in spain from and to Madrid / Barcelona etc.Īll in all i would say that the Captain Sim 767 FSX is still for me best payware addon on the market for the boeing 767 PSS or another company 767 (I also dont like i dont like the appearance of the 2D flight deck, or the overhead panel)Īt the moment i only use the captain Sim 767 with the addon FS Passengers to perform very realistic flights with the FMC within Europe, for ex. ![]() Quality wings 767 (i dont like the appearance of the 2D flight deck at all) Why would i say that the Captain Sim 767 for FS9 and FSX is the best addon for me so far?įirst: There are a lot of very complex addons like the other series for 737,747, 777 - but other addons (in my opinion) steal too much frame rates Years ago i started to fly with FS2004, then FS9, and then FSXīefore i tried different planes and addons for the flight simulator, years ago i very liked the other 737 PIC (pilot in command) and the Boeing 737-300,400,500 the boeing 737 mid Generation.Īfter some years i tired out the Captain Sim 767 for FS9 and Captain Sim 767 for FSX, and i was very satisfied from the flightdeck, the systems simulation and the very well working FMC. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |